Stick to the Optilocks - designed for the job & with the plastic inserts your scope will be perfectly aligned and securely fixed with almost no chance iof damaging it. The Burris Signature rings work on a similar plastic insert principle & will fit onto quite a few manufacturers' bases (Leupold, Redfield, Burris etc).
I once had a Swaro tube marked by Apel rings - caused by the offset clamping action of the wrap around top strap which is about 2/3rd of the circumference (the screws were nipped too tight) - The offset load allowed the underside of the scope tube to crush inwards!!!! - plus it can be difficult springing the strap around the tube even using a mylar strip to stop scratching the tube. IMHO Apel are fine on steel tubed scopes but modern alloy ones are much weaker. - Lesson learned for me!
Ian
Hi guys, I have just acquired a Tikka 595 in .222 and was wondering what the most cost effective method of mounting a scope would be? Optilocks or not? Thanks!
Optilocks are great - but they are pricey - Warne will do the job just as well, TBH.
What scope are you mounting - I may have a set sat around you can have cheap.......
Ok then .....£39.90 and i will throw in a free jiffy bag!
Most people assume that the tubes are actually 1" say in diameter. I wonder how many have actually measured them?
You may be surprised. I have noticed that some quality German makes are not even parallel with one end being larger than the other and neither measuring an inch. It's this that most likely caused you crimping.
Thanks all for the advice and offers! Looking on the top of the action of the M595, I cant seem to see any holes that the optilock posts would go into? Buth there are a few small screws on top?
Thanks all for the advice and offers! Looking on the top of the action of the M595, I cant seem to see any holes that the optilock posts would go into? Buth there are a few small screws on top?