Foxyboy43
Well-Known Member
Thanks Smelly - maybe because I haven't done any updates?Shouldn't on a centered unit FB.
Without checking I think I can see mine on 20x but did have shim the mount.
Thanks Smelly - maybe because I haven't done any updates?Shouldn't on a centered unit FB.
Without checking I think I can see mine on 20x but did have shim the mount.
I don't see this logic, it's one optical instrument looking through another optical instrument, there could very easily be an offset...especially with the Pard clamps.Ffs, it’s an add on unit. A camera looking at a reticle. The laser splash and the box projected onto the screen should line up better. If I took the 007 off the scope and used it on its own it would be the same! Nothing to do with the setup of the scope or the 007’s relationship to it. Do you not understand that smelly dog or are you trying to be pedantic?
The camera is indeed looking at the ocular lense.Ffs, it’s an add on unit. A camera looking at a reticle. The laser splash and the box projected onto the screen should line up better. If I took the 007 off the scope and used it on its own it would be the same! Nothing to do with the setup of the scope or the 007’s relationship to it. Do you not understand that smelly dog or are you trying to be pedantic?
Oh, shame, Bye.The camera is indeed looking at the ocular lense.
The laser is not.
The camera knows not the condition of the scope nor it's axis to the rifle bore.
I understand more than you think you know!
It's obviously a very stressful time for you so I'll bug out.
Besides, I fancy another hot dinner....
Cheers Drew..It’s horizontal mate. Still haven’t been able to get out with all this heat and not getting dark till 10.30. Now the grand kids have come over from Australia for three weeks!!!
But this is not 4K version. Although the concept is probably the same.Is it me or in this video around 2 minutes in is the lrf close to the reticle?
I found this video on YouTube
It is in Latvian but it seems to me, that the guy is centering screen position (5:55), with his scope reticle.
This will likely bring laser splash position closest to the riflescope reticle.
How are you finding the clarity? Do you find the 2.2 base mag better? Thanks for getting back to me I have a Sirius somewhere but I never needed to use it with my sp lrf, I could always spot foxes and on full power it was good to 300 metres.Trying to source an on board ir at the moment. Dealers are all out of stock saying it could be a few months. Also heard they are now illegal! Time will tell, not in a rush as the add on blade is working very well out to well past my comfort zone.![]()
I found this video on YouTube
It is in Latvian but it seems to me, that the guy is centering screen position (5:55), with his scope reticle.
This will likely bring laser splash position closest to the riflescope reticle.
Have an older pard 007 on an meosport 3-15x50 with paralax so I am a litle innterested in this topic. Can I ask @Drew 3 what kind of blade you Are using? The 850 or 940?Trying to source an on board ir at the moment. Dealers are all out of stock saying it could be a few months. Also heard they are now illegal! Time will tell, not in a rush as the add on blade is working very well out to well past my comfort zone.![]()
Hi, using the 850. I can easily see to shoot a fox at 300 yds. The detail is ok to shoot but bring it in to around 250 and it is extremely good. I rarely shoot past 200 yds so dose me perfectly.I
Have an older pard 007 on an meosport 3-15x50 with paralax so I am a litle innterested in this topic. Can I ask @Drew 3 what kind of blade you Are using? The 850 or 940?