There are definitely compelling arguments to stick with the 222. And of course a 6.5 something @Mungo and @Sonicdmb73 ! I’m sure one day I’ll need to ask you both the merits of CM vs Swede vs 260 remmy.
That looks pretty functional to me! And an improvement: there was a bunch of vet wrap around the stock the last time I saw it, if I recall?You mean like this:
You mean like this:
I completely agree with you on your hatred of sound Moderators . However, I dislike the .243 even more , for the same reasons you just stated and more, the ultimate example of what I’d never want to own would be a .243 with sound mod and plastic stock.moderators - hate the bloody things. Unbalance the rifle, add unnecessary length. Have a decent length barrel and noise is kept under control. And for the number of shots with a rifle its hardly a concern. But i am in the minority here.
re 243 and non-toxic - only really an issue in Scotland where we have a min of 100g bullet for bigger deer. Plenty of good 80 to 95gn non- toxic bullets that will do the job very well. And in 222 /223 plenty of good 50gn bullets that also work.
243 works by high velocity and whilst it kills well it rather turns the insidecof deer to pulp. I shot a Roe buck just behind the shoulder with an exit just behind far shoulder at 100 metres with a 100g RWS Soft point bullet a couple of weeks ago . Diaphragm, liver and rumen all ruptured along with heart and lungs. It was if a granade had gone off inside.
with the 275 Or my 7x65r, i get a good clean hole all the way through, beast is knocked down dead but not huge hydrstatic shock that you get with high velocity. And get the same whether I use a 130gn non toxic or a 140gn soft point bullet.

That looks pretty functional to me! And an improvement: there was a bunch of vet wrap around the stock the last time I saw it, if I recall?
That was my old Howa in 6.5CM, now moved on. The one in the picture is a Heym .308 (in fact the one you used on the day we crawled forever in the baking heat).
It upsets @HeymSR20 rather a lot that I did this to it...
At least you still have the original stock so it's but a moment to return it to its former glory, and yes appreciate the adjustable comb etc!!!
Shot it in its new trousers last night.
Very lovely indeed - substantial reduction in felt recoil, much easier to retain a consistent cheek weld, and clear reduction in group size.
Curiously, switching from the wood stock hadn't changed the horizontal zero, but shifted POI down by 2MOA.
Mungo .What make of stock is it
I have been looking at them a while ago for my T3 lite.308. Ended up with putting it into a brand new t3x super varmint stock. Still toying with the idea of one of PSE