How does that work then? Folk capable of writing decent stuff and taking some good photos will replace the advertising features???? Who funds the magazine then?
I don't have any real issue with the magazine except I do think its full of adverts almost suggesting if you don't use this rifle, scope, jacket, trousers, Binos you won't shoot any deer... I buy it probably 3 or 4 times a year for something to flick through. I don't mind the overseas stuff. Trout & Salmon magazine, which I have been buying since the age of 12, never missed a copy, now has occasional overseas features and I'm happy they are included.
I do have an issue though when told stories about folk, made worse when they are about people supposed to be embassadors for our sport, who try to take someone who doesn't know any better to the cleaners with a fee of over £500 to shoot one doe!!!! In fact what possible good do they put back in to stalking when that's how they treat an unsuspecting newcomer? I met Weeman when he told me the story and believe his account as he was prevented parting with the cash because of unforeseen circumstances. Luckily for him.
What are the legal implications in coming on here and publicising a shockingly high price that was attempted to be charged?
As BH says, why not all keep our mouths shut and let folk like that continue to make huge sums of money on the back of someone who doesn't know better...
Since I started taking guests out some of the stories I've been told really boil the blood. It's the one side of stalking that I detest. Fine making a fair living from it, but a living by taking complete advantage of folk desperate to break into the sport???
I would go as far as saying its the ugly side of stalking and it disgusts me....