Actually that's not true.
Numbers below are ballpark and from my recollections of data I got a couple of years back from a Freedom of Information request. So if they are not exact don't crucify me. The gist is correct though.
If you look at the statistics that are reported for "firearms crime" over 50% of them relate to air 'weapons'. That always gets my goat because they are not bloody firearms. Of the 50% that are actually firearms/shotguns 80% of the offences relate to pistols.
So actually there is a strong argument for having them on a ticket given the incidence of 'crimes', and that was without being in possession without a ticket being a crime.
It is illogical to argue that we should not have a law because people continue to break it. That is just pathetic defeatism and a licence for the criminals to do as they want without even the possibility of any sanction. With the law however there is the ability to confiscate as a minimum when they do find one that is illegally held. Let's just defund the Police completely shall we?
As to the surrender of guns, I surrendered mine 'cos they are bloody useless things really and I never used it. I appreciate it is a much bigger sport in England, but the issues clearly exist there as well. It is up to them where to draw the line. Licencing did not fall apart up here when air rifles went on ticket but we don't seem to have all the problems that exist in that department south of the border.
In relation to air weapons not being Firearms, in the eyes of the law in some instances, for example when it comes to ‘prohibited persons’, they are classed as such.
While having a licensing system in place is not necessarily a bad idea, if you take the administrative burden and cost to Police Scotland for doing so and the delays it causes FAC holders in grants, variations etc then, yes to that point it isn’t a bad idea.
The issue you have is there is an unknown amount of air weapons in circulation and, in reality, the amount of ‘firearms offences’ committed, as in those not linked to serious and/or organised crime, involving air weapons or indeed any other firearm are fairly low or negligible.
The real issue is that the existing legislation is, and was in place to sufficiently cover all the offences that were committed pre licensing (in Scotland) but even when applied correctly wouldn’t necessarily get a conviction for a number of reasons.
There are also cases which have been in the press (feel free to look), where the firearms element of a crime, where a statutory 5 year tariff exists for the likes of possessing a firearm illegally, have not been applied and a lesser sentence for that part given but that sits with the CPS/COPFS and courts.
I didn’t see anyone saying to defund the Police which would be ridiculous, although with previous and forthcoming cuts in Scotland by the Scottish Government to both Police and the COPFS/Court budgets, there are significant fiscal challenges for them which will effect crime levels and law abiding shooters trying to navigate through the licensing system and any cuts south of the border will do similar.
To put it into perspective I would take a bet with you that there are significantly more people driving cars daily without a licence or insurance than have air weapons without a certificate in your nearest town or city.