Basc voluntary lead ban

If the BASC had any backbone what so ever, they should use their not inconsiderable Membership fees to make a legal challenge in a court of law and challenge on the basis of scientific evidence, not regurgitated so called scientific reports that wouldn't stand up to proper scrutiny.

It's been said before, BASC has already let shooters down by previously rolling over on the use of lead shot for wild fowling without even bothering to submit a defence by way of a legal challenge.

This latest news if proved to be correct, shows how ineffective this organisation has become in defence of its members and fellow shooters!
 
we keep hearing about this lead shot ban and the affects it has on the enviroment and such like, but most of the uk,s population is still drinking and using water that comes through lead pipes and have done for years. bs
 
 
Voluntary wouldn't work. I bet an awful lot of game shooters (who, remember will go bang with their shotgun many more times that a deerstalker's rifle) will have quite a store of lead cartridges. Also, whilst the difference in price of rifle ammunition is minimal when you shoot off at best a few dozen rounds a year, a game shooter might shoot off maybe a couple of slabs of cartridges and will have to pay a good wedge more.

BASC already worries that many shooters of wildfowl don't always use lead free shot. And it is difficult on a driven day that generally should have pheasants flying over you when some duck come. Obviously you don't have the time to unload and load again, so you either have the choice of shooting with lead or giving them a pass. There's always some that can't resist...

I know that when it freezes over a certain period, we have a voluntary moratorium on shooting wildfowl, which does seem to work, but this would be different.
 
Back
Top