Arkens Zulus 3X or 5X

Soooo - tempted by the current offers on the Zulus (and the auto record function) but not sure if I should go for the 3 or 5X version for my .222 - anyone with real world experience who can offer advice please? Also for the Remmy 700 is it the 0MOA S or 35 MOA L Rail?
Thanks chaps.
🦊🦊

I'm tempted too. Just wish it was 30mm body. Leaning more towards pard DS35-70 purely for that reason.
I have the 5x on my 17 Rem and it is so good. accurate, light and mutch better than I expected.
 
AFAIK, there are no plans for a non LRF 3-12
The 3-12 is aimed primarily at airgunners and rimfire shooters where the LRF and ballistic calculator are at their most useful, so the market for a non LRF version would be quite small
So, get your money out of Fort Knox and ante up for a 3-12 with LRF :D

Cheers

Bruce
 
AFAIK, there are no plans for a non LRF 3-12
The 3-12 is aimed primarily at airgunners and rimfire shooters where the LRF and ballistic calculator are at their most useful, so the market for a non LRF version would be quite small
So, get your money out of Fort Knox and ante up for a 3-12 with LRF :D

Cheers

Bruce
You misunderstood me Bruce, I meant the x5 non Lrf. It'll be going on a 204 Ruger so no need for Lrf
 
I just don't need it mate. The NV I just sold bad ballistic calculator. Using it on my 204, zero at 100 and barely any alterations out to 300. I never bothered even pressing it eventually.
Agreed, on a 204 the LRF is a waste of money
IMHO, the LRF doesn't give any significant advantage on pretty much every centrefire from 222 REM upwards
On rifles like that, the LRF and BC is definitely a "want" rather than a "need"

Cheers

Bruce
 
Agreed, on a 204 the LRF is a waste of money
IMHO, the LRF doesn't give any significant advantage on pretty much every centrefire from 222 REM upwards
On rifles like that, the LRF and BC is definitely a "want" rather than a "need"

Cheers

Bruce
Yep but think just how impressed “your friend” will be when you say with utter conviction and without fear of contradiction “that shot was 219 yards!”.
🦊🦊
 
Agreed, on a 204 the LRF is a waste of money
IMHO, the LRF doesn't give any significant advantage on pretty much every centrefire from 222 REM upwards
On rifles like that, the LRF and BC is definitely a "want" rather than a "need"

Cheers

Bruce
Not sure I agree with that statement Bruce when you want to ensure a clean kill on a Lamb killer that has rumbled you and is heading for the hills, you know he will stop somewhere along the hedge before he goes through.
 
I don’t get having all the LRF and ballistics integrated in the scope either.
For me the most versatile option is a thermal spotter with integrated LRF, spot quarry, ping for distance and shoot with the same holdover or clicks we have all been using up until the last 18months! What do people do when they switch over to normal glass?
 
Back
Top