A tax on exceptional arrogance not on school fees, would be acceptable. If it were tax on exceptional arrogance it would capture Starmer, Rayner and Reeves too, all of whom are individually considerably more arrogant than Johnson, Rees-Mogg, Rory Stewart, the Archbish of C, or Goldsmith combined.
Starmer's a complete ****. Champagne society, self-righteous sphincter. Responsible for an organisation that saw fit to wrongly pursue journalists while doing nothing about notorious paedophiles and colluding in persecuting postmasters in the largest miscarriage of justice ever. Failing upwards all the way. That's before the grotesque political record he has. It's a miracle the man's not in prison, which is certainly where he belongs.
Rayner's ****ing stupid, but only enjoys this absurd reputation because our left-wing media idolises her cretinously because even they can't believe someone with so few qualities could possibly reach such an elevated position. The media consistently do this and consistently get it wrong almost every time: Obama, Biden, Rory Stewart, Savile or whichever other staff member is a sex offender this week, all these BLM activists who turn out to be criminals, Merkel, Lagarde.
Reeves is just a child who thinks she's about eight times cleverer than she is.