Ballistic tips and head / neck shots

Nimrod1960

Well-Known Member
I have been privy to a few conversations recently during which a number of folk who do quite a bit of culling have expressed a preference for basically varmint rounds for head and neck shot placement. I have understood their rationale to be less carcass damage whilst reducing the “variables” of head and neck.

As an engine room only chap I have kept my counsel on this, but .223 Ballistic tips for head shooting muntys?

Is this a thing thats far more common than is generally understood?

Views and opinions please.
 
Not ballistic tips but 123g Sako Gamehead in 30-06 seem to work well, would not recommend if you like shooting into heavy cover though.

Not got a .223 though.
 
That's what I use for head shots. They're amazing. Couldn't ask for a better round for the job. Empties their heads completely.
I know someone that shoots all his red deer with those bullets, head/neck. Never get a runner.
 
I use bonded core bullets, I find the sako super hammerheads will drive on through if poi isn’t bang on poa. I’m sure BTs are fine, but I’d think that if you touched a spot on the head with a BT bullet that you weren’t aiming for, then there could be problems.
 
I’m struggling to see why it wouldn’t be a good idea if head shooting to use something more frangible. There are plenty of things in the head and neck which if even slightly damaged will result in a swift dispatch and it’s not a tough target. Added shrapnel increases the chance of causing a fatal injury with a less than perfect placement. Using a tough bullet is going to give less room for error if the bullet path doesn’t hit something vital.

My only thought would be not to go so light that there’s a risk the bullet might not penetrate the nasal structure if the shot it a bit low.
 
Back in the day I used to help cull a large number of red hinds. We used ballistic tip varmint type bullets and head shots to maximise return on meat (in those days venison was valuable). The head would pretty much explode with eyeballs all being forced out etc. I wasn’t pretty but very effective. We were using 25-06’s and 6mm wild cats with fixed 10x42 scopes and 26” barrels. Very flat shooting and never considered having to aim off. We would get as close we could before starting to shoot. Just made the whole process so much easier. Often we took 15 to 20 hinds of between 3 of us in a day. No moderators either, range finders, digital optics, twiddly turrets etc.

A ballistic tip varmint type bullet for such shooting causes massive damage - much more so than a more typical hunting bullet. Big downside that when on the odd occasion you had to take a body shot they wouldn’t penetrate the shoulder but would make a real mess of the carcass.

On game ranches in Africa, when culling for meat, tool of choice is a 223 with similar bullets and head shots.

Where head shots go wrong is when ranges are long and / or you are in very broken ground or woodland / scrub land. If the head shot doesn’t kill it can leave a highly mobile but badly wounded animal.

On open ground, once you have shot, wait ten minutes where you are. You should be in a very steady position. If any thing is going to try and get up, it will do so within a few minutes as it regains consciousness - you then have the ability to shoot it again. Nae chance if you are in lots of cover.

If you start at closer ranges you also have plenty of ability to shoot something again if it runs after first shot. If you open the batting at 300 odd yards you have little chance for follow up.

In those days my shooting ability, eyesight and general fitness was a lot better than it is today.
 
Is that in a 223? Which bullets exactly. Very interested to know. Cheers
You really need to look at the bullet description and intended use. Manufacturer websites are the goto place. Varmint / Vermin bullets will described as fast expansion, whereas bullets intended for big animals will be of tougher construction. These days a large proportion of bullets have a “ballistic tip“.

So for example compare the Hornady V-Max bullet to their ELDX or CX. Side by side they look very similar, put one of each of the same calibre and weight on bench - hard to tell apart. But the in V-Max is a soft lead core with a thin jacket designed for explosive expansion on small soft varmints - bullet probably won’t exit on a fox, but inside will be liquid. ELDX is tougher bullet designed for deer and predators, whilst the CX is a monolithic copper.
 
I wouldn’t over think this. I’ve yet to find a deer that didn’t fall over on a neck shot whether I’m using soft points or BT.
 
Back
Top