Heym SR20
Well-Known Member
For some peoples, the green soup is a delicacy and often their only source of green vegetable matter.Then you can have green soup with your venison![]()
For some peoples, the green soup is a delicacy and often their only source of green vegetable matter.Then you can have green soup with your venison![]()
Spurious. See above "but these last for a few million bullets" - evidently the tooling would have needed replacement more recently than 60 years in the majority of cases. Barnes uses old equipment too, so that will also be depreciated, and in accordance with your idea would therefore be considerably cheaper.Manufacturing of Copper Bullets.
Two main methods. Stamping and Swaging - using large stamping machines with dies, a piece of copper is bashed into the shape of a bullet over several steps. This is how the vast majority of bullets ate produced on an industrial scale. With traditional bullets, part of the process includes feeding in a lead wire and then swaging the jacket around the core.
This is a capital intensive process with very expensive dies being made for each bullet type, but these last for a few million bullets produced.
This is how military, and most cheap ammunition is produced.
Expensive to set up, but low cost per unit produced, especially once all the assets have written right down.
Very capital intensive to set up a new production run, or to introduce a new shape or design of bullet. And it probably takes a few days to switch from one product to another when running a production run.
2) small scale machining. Much easier to do with a monolithic bullet than a two dissimilar cored bullet, but you start with a rod of copper or brass (an alloy of Copper with Zinc), chuck it in a lathe and turn up a bullet. It is no more or less difficult than mass producing other parts such as a bolt. With a simple copying jig on a basic lathe and a machinest to run it, you can make very good bullets. Cost of labour would be high though per unit.
Most monolithic bullet manufacturers will use an automatic CNC controlled lathe. Such machines are readily available and not a huge cost. Bullets are designed on CAD, translated into a CNC File and loaded into the system. It takes very little time to switch production across from say a 130gn 7mm bullet to a 120gn 6.5mm bullet.
But most of production has been to date relatively small scale production in small designer owned businesses with all the design work being recouped in the first years of production.
When you buy a cup and core bullet, it was designed 60 years ago, probably made on machinery 60 plus years old and fully depreciated.
When you buy a copper bullet you are still paying for all the design work and testing that went into the bullet.
See above. Neither claim is convincing.You will also be paying for CNC tooling as this will yet to be depreciated.
This is not an "as always". Often that is the case, but often the opposite is the case.As always as volumes go up, prices will come down.
Not much. Most RFDs hold pretty small stocks. In any event, the argument is unconvincing because that factor would affect lead and copper ammunition to an equal extent.At the retail end, RFDs are currently having to carry all types of ammunition, so you are paying for cost of such ammo sitting in the warehouse and on dealers shelves.
UnbelievableThe UK is not a large market, but itās a significant market for ammunition. At present copper is a premium product and price accordingly.
Now that are definitive dates and certainty, manufacturers and suppliers can start investing for the future demand.
Some will stick their heads in the sand, whinge hugely and go out of business.
Others will make good decisions and see the opportunity.
Barnes does this sort of thing and glhsve been for decades, yet the bullets are still twice the priceMmmm. No. You are already having to swage copper sheet into copper cups to take a lead core for a lead bullet.
If you are swaging / stamping solid copper bullets there are many fewer processes than in producing a lead cored bullet. Hence less machine time and cheaper manufacturing.
Where did you originate this fact? Is there any data on it or are you just assuming?Most current production of copper bullets is on CNC milling - less capex cost, but slower production rates.
There already appears to be considerable competition with many manufacturers....still no sign of the supposedly consequent price reductions. By what year do you expect this to happen given that copper manufacturers have been mass producing for over two decades and apparently none of these reductions has yet occurred?Once manufacturing is switched to high volume stamping and swaging production costs will come down.
Copper ammunition is sold at a premium. Again as volumes go up there will be much competition and thus prices will come down.
That depends on people's personal arrangements and is not relevant anyway.Regardless, the actual cost of ammunition is a very small part of the cost of stalking.
Last week, I walked out of the door, shot three deer and the cost of the ammunition was 100% of the cost of stalking. Equally irrelevant.Most lead ammo is £30 to £40 a box of 20. Copper is £50 to £70 a box for same number.
Last weekend we shot 8 deer, that was 8 bullets used. We drove 150 miles and spent Ā£40 each on bāfast on way up and a good meal on way back.
It's not when it also requires people to buy new guns or where irreplaceable guns are rendered unusable. At best, it doubles the cost for people who fire ammunition at a greater rate than 8 or 10 rounds a week.And colleagues running a few thousand pounds worth of electronic vision equipment.
So really the extra cost of copper bullets is pretty minimal in the great scheme of things.
Mmmm. No. You are already having to swage copper sheet into copper cups to take a lead core for a lead bullet.
If you are swaging / stamping solid copper bullets there are many fewer processes than in producing a lead cored bullet. Hence less machine time and cheaper manufacturing.
Most current production of copper bullets is on CNC milling - less capex cost, but slower production rates.
Once manufacturing is switched to high volume stamping and swaging production costs will come down.
Copper ammunition is sold at a premium. Again as volumes go up there will be much competition and thus prices will come down.
Regardless, the actual cost of ammunition is a very small part of the cost of stalking.
Most lead ammo is £30 to £40 a box of 20. Copper is £50 to £70 a box for same number.
Last weekend we shot 8 deer, that was 8 bullets used. We drove 150 miles and spent Ā£40 each on bāfast on way up and a good meal on way back.
And colleagues running a few thousand pounds worth of electronic vision equipment.
So really the extra cost of copper bullets is pretty minimal in the great scheme of things.
The classic British I fear the establishment.If they monitor the shooting forums, which they do - they will already have a shortlist of whose mattresses to look under
Are you suggesting it isnāt BASCās faultā¦..?Iām really not fussed either way. I have perfectly effective loads in copper or lead for everything I shoot.
Been obvious for years it was going to end up this way.
Not yet, but the proposed legislation bans ā the sale, use and possessionā of lead ammunition post transition period.The classic British I fear the establishment.
Is there anything in law that prevents one from storing lead ammunition?
Itās not a suggestion, thats a flat fact. BASC and every other shooting organisation fought the ban. The problem they faced was the REACH conclusion that lead is harmful with no safe level of exposure. That comes from the WHO and no one has been able to contradict the science.Are you suggesting it isnāt BASCās faultā¦..?![]()
Looks like somebody was paying attention during the previous 30 years of negotiations with the shooting organisations that went nowhereā¦I saw that, they snuck ā possessionā in.
Just ammunition?Not yet, but the proposed legislation bans ā the sale, use and possessionā of lead ammunition post transition period.
All that lead flashing from the church roof is ok mate...the day they ban lead entirely is the day that we are screwedJust ammunition?
On the deercast podcast it was suggested that you would have to have a variation on your licence to hold lead ammo.how they going to police it?
Whoās going to stop you buying lead bullets in bulk, between then and now?
If it comes in we can arrange a mass ranges day across the country just before the deadline to use up unused ammo and commiserate together.On the deercast podcast it was suggested that you would have to have a variation on your licence to hold lead ammo.
So that'll mean a nice money earner and I reason come inspect your ammo gun safe.
I wouldn't be surprised if we all end up just handing unused lead ammo to the police unless we have a range to shoot it at
On the deercast podcast it was suggested that you would have to have a variation on your licence to hold lead ammo.
So that'll mean a nice money earner and I reason come inspect your ammo gun safe.
I wouldn't be surprised if we all end up just handing unused lead ammo to the police unless we have a range to shoot it at
If thatās a case Iāll need to be compensatedOn the deercast podcast it was suggested that you would have to have a variation on your licence to hold lead ammo.
So that'll mean a nice money earner and I reason come inspect your ammo gun safe.
I wouldn't be surprised if we all end up just handing unused lead ammo to the police unless we have a range to shoot it at
Waste of good bullets, they have to buy them back simple as thatIf it comes in we can arrange a mass ranges day across the country just before the deadline to use up unused ammo and commiserate together.
Again how they going to police it?Not yet, but the proposed legislation bans ā the sale, use and possessionā of lead ammunition post transition period.