Copper and blood trails

SSTs have their place but there are very few in the UK that need their performance as they are designed to perform optimally at 300 yards plus. Otherwise head shots only !! I have also seen terrible meat damage with them in the past and won’t use them any more.
I think their actual intended purpose is a long range elk bullet.
 
SSTs have their place but there are very few in the UK that need their performance as they are designed to perform optimally at 300 yards plus. Otherwise head shots only !! I have also seen terrible meat damage with them in the past and won’t use them any more.
Last Fallow I shot in Lincoln with the .243 as my friend had my .270 was 250 yds went right through it done the lungs and a neat hole on the other side it was 63kg and ran 60 yds 95gn sst
 
Move your point of aim forwards a tiny bit. Stay within the vital triangle as named by Kevin Robertson in the Perfect Shot rather than doing the traditional double lung shot Which is just behind the vertical line and risks splitting the rumen.
Thanks Selous,
My missus is getting into shooting & deer stalking, like a lot of women she actually takes things a whole lot more seriously than us blokes - admits she has lots to learn & doesn't claim she already knows everything. However, like a lot of women she's not always so eager to take advice from her OH
So, that pic of yours is well-timed, I'll save it for her, and she can study it.
It shows exactly what I've been saying to her, which is basically, "split the front legs & halfway up the body" :thumb:
 
If only all are deer presented like the perfect shot picture shows ....... The fact is they dont and we have to learn how to take shots from various angles , especially when you are looking to take more than a single beast from the group etc
 
My experience of 308 130gn TTSX and 6.5 100gn TTSX is very similar to the OP’s experience, very limited or non existent blood trails. That being said they kill with authority, they don’t tend to blow up as badly so I really just aim for the major bones in the shoulder to pin them.

Slightly off topic-there certainly is the odd anomaly. Shot a stag a short while ago with a mates rifle (6.5x55 120g TTSX sako factory). It had seen us, ran to 100yds where I had a quick shot as it was only pausing briefly. It ran 40-60 yards and went down as expected. I moved in and it’s head came up so shot again and killed it (headshot). I thought I’d dragged the shot slightly but nope, double lung. It’d been sat there for ten minutes as well, just seeming hadn't bled out. Took 3 others that day with clinical performance with that rifle/round. That’s my overall experience-they kill well and are fit for purpose generally but there is the odd bemusing episode. My own rifles are hand loaded hot and kill very well.
 
Here is a Roe Buck, 223 51gn Peregrine. 120 odd yards. Ran 10 yards and good blood trail. No vet would have had a chance in trying to fix this one.
 

Attachments

  • 9312DBC6-F4CE-46B7-B4C3-1B4C23945C3B.webp
    9312DBC6-F4CE-46B7-B4C3-1B4C23945C3B.webp
    466.2 KB · Views: 48
  • 2F22F7A3-F209-42F8-BE24-FD0AB5DD5A04.webp
    2F22F7A3-F209-42F8-BE24-FD0AB5DD5A04.webp
    416.7 KB · Views: 48
  • 1A335308-E0A9-421F-A43E-6FDBEE73E72D.webp
    1A335308-E0A9-421F-A43E-6FDBEE73E72D.webp
    687.5 KB · Views: 48
My experience of 308 130gn TTSX and 6.5 100gn TTSX is very similar to the OP’s experience, very limited or non existent blood trails. That being said they kill with authority, they don’t tend to blow up as badly so I really just aim for the major bones in the shoulder to pin them.

Slightly off topic-there certainly is the odd anomaly. Shot a stag a short while ago with a mates rifle (6.5x55 120g TTSX sako factory). It had seen us, ran to 100yds where I had a quick shot as it was only pausing briefly. It ran 40-60 yards and went down as expected. I moved in and it’s head came up so shot again and killed it (headshot). I thought I’d dragged the shot slightly but nope, double lung. It’d been sat there for ten minutes as well, just seeming hadn't bled out. Took 3 others that day with clinical performance with that rifle/round. That’s my overall experience-they kill well and are fit for purpose generally but there is the odd bemusing episode. My own rifles are hand loaded hot and kill very well.
i dont get the gaping holes i got with lead on the oposite side of the beast but i do get opposite side exit holes very reliably! Thing id the big holes with lead ( reason i got them was of course was metal lost "lead mainly" ) Never got 100 % weight retention with lead , unless it misses totally you wont ever! Actually on ballance well happy , the dog can track but i have yet to need those services using ther TTSX
 
If only all are deer presented like the perfect shot picture shows ....... The fact is they dont and we have to learn how to take shots from various angles , especially when you are looking to take more than a single beast from the group etc
The point still stands though - what @Selous has shown is where on a perfectly broadside animal to aim in order to hit top of heart. The point is take out top of the heart (not just try hit both lungs behind the shoulders like most people seem to think is ideal) and you'll get fewer runners and shorter run distance as well as good blood trails. The diagram produced is just an aid in explaining how you change from the traditional "best practice".

Perhaps the below best practice image would be more satisfactory to you even though it illustrates exactly the same point as has been made previous.

Ben

1668958706302.webp
 
The point still stands though - what @Selous has shown is where on a perfectly broadside animal to aim in order to hit top of heart. The point is take out top of the heart (not just try hit both lungs behind the shoulders like most people seem to think is ideal) and you'll get fewer runners and shorter run distance as well as good blood trails. The diagram produced is just an aid in explaining how you change from the traditional "best practice".

Perhaps the below best practice image would be more satisfactory to you even though it illustrates exactly the same point as has been made previous.

Ben

View attachment 281719
it is of course far better ilustrated ( which was my point really ) The hart and the cavity is inside the deer . The intention is and should always be " the best shot that presents " There are lots of much preferred shots on these beasts but we don't know the range or the wind etc . Best practice remains what it is "a classroom exercise"
 
It seems that traditionally people have settled on where to shoot, up the front legor just slightly behind and then have chosen bullets that work well here. Lead bullets that expand and lose a lot of weight by shedding lead into the chest cavity.

The same stalkers no doubt have either tried something like an Accubond and found it just punched a hole through so stopped using them and chose a more suitable bullet.

If these stalker's then try copper bullets and use the same point of aim funnily enough you'll get the same results as a really tough lead core bullet but in this case blame all copper bullets and not the fact they paired the wrong bullet to the wrong shot placement.

If you want to get a double lung shot to save some meat then using a copper bullet designed for 100% weight retention isn't the right choice but something like the Virtus or Yewtree TLR is more suitable with shedding the copper petals.

If you have always shot through the shoulders to drop on the spot or take out the Hillar zone then switching to copper will have little to no difference.
 
I would add that I tend to pin shoot because the Barnes tend to not blow the shoulders to bits, not because I struggle to find deer off H/L shots. Putting my preferred lead option (Sierra) through shoulders tender to yield a rather dramatic result that game dealers dislike. With aforementioned TTSX home loads deer don’t tend to trundle more than a few yards.
 
This was with .308 SST some years ago. I soon ditched these, always massive carcass damage

SST bullet, .308 150g.webpAfter years and hundreds of deer with my favourite Swift Sciroccos in 6.5 and Partitions in .308 (both Goldilocks bullets, good expansion but not too much), I moved to Fox 123g in 6.5mm.
A wobbly start, but now some 38 deer later, this is the result - small hole in, destroyed internals, somewhat larger hole on the way out. Just as good as the aforementioned lead cored bullets in my opinion.

IMG_7624.webp
IMG_7621.webp
 
Don’t know if it’s me, but I’ve had a run of deer leaving no significant blood trails. I’m shooting fox 130grain in .270. This morning , for instance, the only Sign was a tuft of hair at the shot site, for what turned out to be a rib to rib lung shot. The deer went about 20 metres into cover and there was only blood for the last metre, and not a huge amount even then. The dogs happy with all the work and the deer are dropping dead in the usual distances, but I’m curious as to other peoples experience with fox and other copper rounds.
How big is the exit wound? Assuming that you are always getting one.
 
If you ate going to double lung deer, their going to run no matter what bullet you use!

This pic is from my copper archives 130gb ttsx from my 270win, now i think you will agree, this bullet had done the job lovely.

If memory serves me well, it was a long shot on a large hind, i call a long shot over 300m
 

Attachments

  • AF97E9E9-DE1F-474D-9690-F4DAB360C92B.webp
    AF97E9E9-DE1F-474D-9690-F4DAB360C92B.webp
    56.2 KB · Views: 42
Back
Top