Give it timeThink I wet my last bed at age 4.![]()
Give it timeThink I wet my last bed at age 4.![]()
A lot of people voted for Brexit on two fronts, we would take back control of our borders and reduce Imigration secondly it would be better for our economy, to date both of those turned out to be incorrectBrexit referendum: People voted for Brexit and got Brexit. Losers didn’t like it and wanted second referendum.
2024 election: People voted for Labour manifesto promising no tax rises, protection of the countryside, voters to keep more of their money and a lighter touch government, much higher economic growth and growth the be paramount, politicians acting with complete integrity - and got massive tax rises, incredibly sleazy and corrupt politicians, widespread industrialisation of the countryside, the economy trashed, rising unemployment - large scale redundancies, reduced investment, class warfare, energy security destroyed, racist MPs being acceptable, and an HR lawyer leader aligning the UK with concentration camps and terrorism as acceptable.
There is a category difference between people who lost a vote on an issue fair and square, and people disgruntled about having voted for A and got Z.
Are you able to discern any categorical difference between a general election to select a government and an advisory referendum to show opinion on a single issue?A lot of people voted for Brexit on two fronts, we would take back control of our borders and reduce Imigration secondly it would be better for our economy, to date both of those turned out to be incorrect
Be it a single issue, Brexit or a general election both sides make arguments as to why you should vote for them as they try and win your vote. In the Brexit referendum the two major factors that influenced voters on the leave side were taking back control of Imigration and reducing it plus it would be good for the economy, picture of Boris next to a bus with a simple example of how much money we would “ save” and how much would go to the NHS. Labour got in to power largely off the back of 14 years of conservative rule with the last 4 years being a shambles. Labour made a number of pledges the main one being to grow the economy we are less than a year in let’s see how they do. We who voted to remain lost and so we have had to get on with it, Labour won with a landslide parliamentary majority and so lots of people will “ have to get on with that” and stop whingingAre you able to discern any categorical difference between a general election to select a government and an advisory referendum to show opinion on a single issue?
Must admit I've actually agreed with a few of your posts recently, but no, not having that as a legitimate reply. It's exactly the same. Democratic vote, & majority decided. Any other twist or spin is completely immaterial. The people have spoken. Doesn't matter if you happily accept it or cry like a widdle bïtch aka Petition: Call a General Election, the result remains the same.Brexit referendum: People voted for Brexit and got Brexit. Losers didn’t like it and wanted second referendum.
2024 election: People voted for Labour manifesto promising no tax rises, protection of the countryside, voters to keep more of their money and a lighter touch government, much higher economic growth and growth the be paramount, politicians acting with complete integrity - and got massive tax rises, incredibly sleazy and corrupt politicians, widespread industrialisation of the countryside, the economy trashed, rising unemployment - large scale redundancies, reduced investment, class warfare, energy security destroyed, racist MPs being acceptable, and an HR lawyer leader aligning the UK with concentration camps and terrorism as acceptable.
There is a category difference between people who lost a vote on an issue fair and square, and people disgruntled about having voted for A and got Z.
You're wrong here because the difference is misrepresentation of the product. You're saying that you'd have no grounds for complaint if you agreed to buy a dozen sheep from me, but in fact I supplied some diseased hamsters and robbed you.Must admit I've actually agreed with a few of your posts recently, but no, not having that as a legitimate reply. It's exactly the same. Democratic vote, & majority decided.
Spin may be immaterial but the fundamentals are important.Any other twist or spin is completely immaterial.
The people have spoken. Doesn't matter if you happily accept it or cry like a widdle bĂŻtch aka Petition: Call a General Election, the result remains the same.
You're wrong here because the difference is misrepresentation of the product. You're saying that you'd have no grounds for complaint if you agreed to buy a dozen sheep from me, but in fact I supplied some diseased hamsters and robbed you.
Brexit is just a case of the people who didnt vote for something complaining, whereas now the people who did vote for something are disgruntled.
Spin may be immaterial but the fundamentals are important.
It's absolutely not. Even the most cretinous, biased & thicko voter knows they're is one of two options. You're basing your vote on either yes/no, them/us. It's not at all difficult. It's why democracy works, the issue is understanding what **** your fed in the propaganda. But once you've decided it's not difficult.You're wrong here because the difference is misrepresentation of the product.
It doesn't though does it.It's why democracy works
Doesn't it??It doesn't though does it.
That’s completely untrue, as well you know and every one else, a lot of people voted for Brexit for many reasons one of which is not being ruled by corrupt agents of other countries that were not elected by anybody, financial corruption that was not able to be redressed, unelected MEP’s on a massive gravy train. Or was it just me.A lot of people voted for Brexit on two fronts, we would take back control of our borders and reduce Imigration secondly it would be better for our economy, to date both of those turned out to be incorrect
Give it time![]()

No, and it was not that to which I referred. There is however sufficient polling data giving Labour approval ratings as low as 9%, which clearly indicate that a hefty majority of Labour voters are disgruntled with the corruption, money-grubbing, lying, rising unemployment, higher bills, deception, refusal to be accountable, and crashing of the economy, all of which have been deliberate actions which go directly against what was promised.Can you prove that the majority of the respondents on that petition actually voted labour?
Can you prove that claim?Frankly, based on social media and on here, the main respondents to this are the Tory and Reform voters who didn't get their way.
Pot meet kettle indeed.Pot meet kettle.
As if this makes a difference. People when they had a chance didn't turn up to vote and even if another election was called, the turnout won't be any different. So apart from wasting more money I very much doubt if this will make any difference. Best to let labour run its course so that they can be voted out with no chance of return for the next few decades. Sometimes you need to go through enough pain for a generation to remember to turn up to vote. 300k out of almost 67 million is 0.45%
View attachment 394623
What could possibly go wrong………….comrade?may be the future is online voting, so no need to turn out.