Geco factory ammo an almost blow up.

Yep, I'm struggling to get my head around how that "rim" has been formed. Looks broadly consistent around the head, other than the ejector. I'm not familiar with that rifle though so I just looked up a few images of the bolt and the bolt face it broadly flat, with no rebate like I'm used to on Sako / Tikka etc.

View attachment 428991

So I guess if there's a gap between bolt face and chamber with significant overpressure, the brass will be forced into a rim?
Spot on
 
The action in the picture is a Mannlicher Schoenauer. They certainly were never chambered in .243, so a custom barrel one can only assume.
 
How very odd - I too thought it was a rimmed case!
Photo not that clear but has the case failed just above the head? I can get the case head “flowing” to fill any void caused by a partially closed bolt upon firing (like how could that happen?) but there's a helluva lot of brass to flow to create such havoc with the flash hole and primer pocket - kinda suggests an oversized flash hole/pocket but then how would that ever happen?
Be very interesting to hear what the proof house experts conclude….
🦊🦊
 
The bolt likely does not close squarely up to the chamber. I think the originals did and a slot in the barrel was cut for the extractor. But if it’s a custom barrel, they may have taken a shortcut and avoided the extractor recess cut, and left a small amount of case between the bolt face and chamber exposed.
 
I will keep all informed with bated breath.
He did have a K98 fully engraved best German gunsmith built last year go off oddly at a chamois which did not react as expected but did expire and when he looked at the rifle the foresight was turned 45 degrees off rom the vertical and he could unscrew the barrel by hand. He is just not a lucky chappie.
 
How did the barrel come to be removed from the action? -Muir

I will keep all informed with bated breath.
He did have a K98 fully engraved best German gunsmith built last year go off oddly at a chamois which did not react as expected but did expire and when he looked at the rifle the foresight was turned 45 degrees off rom the vertical and he could unscrew the barrel by hand. He is just not a lucky chappie.
Perhaps, for unknown reasons, he has been in the habit of removing the barrels from his rifles’ actions regularly and thus causing these accidents by loose barrels?
 
Aye I get that but for such an increase would the weaker (i.e. the thinner wall) areas of the case not have failed catastrophically first?
🦊🦊
It would have had to have somewhere to fail to - and I guess they didn't because it was intact and supported by the chamber wall.
The case-head, however, wasn't adequately-supported for the pressure it was taking - either because the pressure was too high and/or the support inadequate.
Still didn't completely fail, though.

The well-known annular failure of cases above the web is not usually the AFAIK result of too much pressure, but too much stretching - the stretching resulting in thinning of the wall, and failure occurring when the final stretch tears the case-body. While there's brass there with chamber behind it, it stays intact.
 
I will keep all informed with bated breath.
He did have a K98 fully engraved best German gunsmith built last year go off oddly at a chamois which did not react as expected but did expire and when he looked at the rifle the foresight was turned 45 degrees off rom the vertical and he could unscrew the barrel by hand. He is just not a lucky chappie.
Hmm, same gunsmith?
 
Yep, I'm struggling to get my head around how that "rim" has been formed. Looks broadly consistent around the head, other than the ejector. I'm not familiar with that rifle though so I just looked up a few images of the bolt and the bolt face it broadly flat, with no rebate like I'm used to on Sako / Tikka etc.

View attachment 428991

So I guess if there's a gap between bolt face and chamber with significant overpressure, the brass will be forced into a rim?
Yes it could be one of the problems. With a rimmed cartridge it would have had better support at the base, but its still a pressure problem.
 
DEVA is the German centre for checking and they will no doubt have seen this before. The joke is it was a Geco cartridge in .243 of that I have no doubt about it as he is a Vet and is not daft. But the pressure has smoothed out all evidence headstamp of the originality of the make. Doing forensic on the brass compared to the rest of the pack might be the only way to get to define the maker.
 
A .243 Mannlicher Schoenauer need not be a custom job. The GK model was factory chambered in .243, among other modern options.

I've never seen brass fail like this. It looks like it expanded into what should have been the space for a rimmed cartridge. Does the wonder have other M-Sch rifles: i.e., is there any possibility of a bolt mix-up?
 
Perhaps, for unknown reasons, he has been in the habit of removing the barrels from his rifles’ actions regularly and thus causing these accidents by loose barrels?
Barrels are not usually easily removed unless it is designed to do so -Muir
 
A .243 Mannlicher Schoenauer need not be a custom job. The GK model was factory chambered in .243, among other modern options.

I've never seen brass fail like this. It looks like it expanded into what should have been the space for a rimmed cartridge. Does the wonder have other M-Sch rifles: i.e., is there any possibility of a bolt mix-up?
Interesting I believe he has more of them. I will call him.
Barrels are not usually easily removed unless it is designed to do so -Muir
I asked him, the barrel was not removed the receiver in the background was a deco off his desk. The Mannlicher model is MC (Monte Carlo). He is also 100% sure the bolts have not been switched.
 
What are the chances this was a production line failure, and something like a 6x62R ended up in a box of .243?




Take a look at the photo in Post 45 in the above thread - I bet that would chamber in a .243 and give you exactly what’s happened here.
 
Last edited:
No way to check what it was as it is now fireformed to .243 dimensions and the headstamp has been destroyed by the firing.
Plus I will bet he does not have such a rare rifle in his gun room (he is an RFD).
 
What are the chances this was a production line failure, and something like a 6x62R ended up in a box of .243?




Take a look at the photo in Post 45 in the above thread - I bet that would chamber in a .243 and give you exactly what’s happened here.
Not a wise wager for you. The base to the start of the shoulder dimension is 10mm (3/8”) longer for the 6x62 Freres than the .243 Win.
 
Back
Top