reiver
Well-Known Member
Why not ? They all get usedWhat the he'll does he want 47 guns in the first
Why not ? They all get usedWhat the he'll does he want 47 guns in the first
Drs report was lateWere they late putting the paperwork in?
You sound like my missus.What the he'll does he want 47 guns in the first place
Because of the applicant or because of the doctor, only reason I bring it up is, if they did all the paperwork with the time frame then they shouldn't have to pay for storageDrs report was late
I agree.What the he'll does he want 47 guns in the first place
maybe looking for one they can shoot worth a damb ? LOL ! Serious though a wrong un with just one gun is many times more dangerous than a collector , via Home office guidelines this " unknown person " will need to stay within rules the same as RFDsWhat the he'll does he want 47 guns in the first place
Why not if he/she has good reason.What the he'll does he want 47 guns in the first place
I think thats the case, many forces are now reviewing old cases where people have had there guns taken away and got them back!If the police are clearing up past errors of "fit to be entrusted" judgement then fair enough.
Late getting his medical records sorted.Because of the applicant or because of the doctor, only reason I bring it up is, if they did all the paperwork with the time frame then they shouldn't have to pay for storage
Very true. I have met one or two over the past few years that I refuse to take out or deal with, after seeing how they handle themselves and approach firearm ownership. One cannot blame the police for being cautious at times, its a fine line to tread at times.
However I do feel that the whole system needs a thorough review. Especially as I cannot fathom why any firearms owner is not required to have public liability insurance added to an application.
How late? How early before renewal did he apply? As the my are valid for months.Drs report was late
Think it was just under the 8 weeksHow late? How early before renewal did he apply? As the my are valid for months.
I have a relatively high holding, not a mile off your mate’s, I got the doctor’s report 5 months before renewal date and my application in 4 months early to make sure I would avoid storage costs. I also let the old bill know what their storage costs would be if they didn’t get my ticket back out to me on time.
I asked that a while back Malc the response was that “we are the police and not interested in insurance,RA-MS etc, in the event you have an incident you will be investigated and arrested as normal irrespective of any paperwork including land clearance that you may hold, we are are upholders of the law “
That is a standard condition and should be on all FACs issues for target shooting (as opposed to practice and zeroing).I'll have to check my FAC but I'm sure for many years my target shooting condition included words to the effect of "to be used on ranges where adequate [3rd part liability] insurance is in place" so sounds like another lack of consistency....
Unfortunately he only really has himself to blame in that casejust und
Think it was just under the 8 weeks
That is a standard condition and should be on all FACs issues for target shooting (as opposed to practice and zeroing).
Are you Zanes from airgunBbs by any chance?
Not at all, I hope you're well, I met you once in a car park when we did a bulk powder deal from Adamant.One and the same. I hope this isn't a case of my reputation has preceded me....
I stand to be corrected, but we must be one of the only European countries where it is not a requirement. Frankly having seen two people who own firearms over the past 4 or 5 years and what they would shoot without any backstop, its a wonder there are not more accidents in the UK.I asked that a while back Malc the response was that “we are the police and not interested in insurance,RA-MS etc, in the event you have an incident you will be investigated and arrested as normal irrespective of any paperwork including land clearance that you may hold, we are are upholders of the law “