Bunnydoom. This I think is exactly the reason many people would consider a club in which they have a democratic vote would seem appealing. As you I find there does seem to be a fairly small but significant number of people who either guard "their" ground with total secrecy and assume all newcomers are potential competition. Or offer the promise of stalking which either deminishes along with the number of deer and the money deposited. One can only assume this is due to there being more people who wish to stalk mainly in a recreational way than there is ground available. As most land owners would wish to have their ground maintained by either a small group or a single PH over which they have a large degree of control. This could be provided by a club, which one would hope could attract members with considerable experience who could not only oversee the management of an area but could pass on this knowledge to members, much as a good host does for his client in the normal paid day scenario. Land owners would benefit from the knowledge of more than one deer manager.
All this said I would think that the BDS must already being offering something similar to its members?
All this said I would think that the BDS must already being offering something similar to its members?