Sighthound
Active Member
When I applied for my FAC last year I asked for a .308 for deer stalking and a .22RF.
Didn’t really want the .22RF, it was just there be used as an expandable concession to get the .308 for stalking as a first grant (held FAC previously some years back, but only for target shooting).
Anyway, I got a much harder time over the rimfire than the centrefire and the upshot was that the 22RF was knocked back to FAC air and the .308 went through.
The FEO’s reservations were based on the fact that while I had plenty of range experience I had not been out on my own in the countryside and therefore could not prove that I had the judgment required to be safe shot in terms of backstops/ ricochet etc. (I can only assume that as most of our deer control is carried out from highseats as part of a co-ordinated team cull he was thought the risk of me sending a bullet to the next town with the .308 was relatively lower).
I wasn’t bothered at the time as I got what I wanted, but I’m starting to do an increasingly amount of pest control around the release pens on the shoot and a .22RF to deal with rabbits, squirrels (on the ground) and the occasional very close range fox would now be a really useful tool.
My question is, if I put in for a variation (.22 FAC Air to .22RF) on a unfilled slot is this something that is likely to be dealt with as a 1-for-1 by the Firearms Licensing Manager or will the FEO visit me as if I am adding an additional slot and put me through the mangle again?
I probably won’t bother if it’s the later, although I could argue that as I have shot deer and fox on my own in the interim I can justify that I can now exercise safe judgement...
(BTW Thames Valley Police is my licensing authority).
What do you think?
Didn’t really want the .22RF, it was just there be used as an expandable concession to get the .308 for stalking as a first grant (held FAC previously some years back, but only for target shooting).
Anyway, I got a much harder time over the rimfire than the centrefire and the upshot was that the 22RF was knocked back to FAC air and the .308 went through.
The FEO’s reservations were based on the fact that while I had plenty of range experience I had not been out on my own in the countryside and therefore could not prove that I had the judgment required to be safe shot in terms of backstops/ ricochet etc. (I can only assume that as most of our deer control is carried out from highseats as part of a co-ordinated team cull he was thought the risk of me sending a bullet to the next town with the .308 was relatively lower).
I wasn’t bothered at the time as I got what I wanted, but I’m starting to do an increasingly amount of pest control around the release pens on the shoot and a .22RF to deal with rabbits, squirrels (on the ground) and the occasional very close range fox would now be a really useful tool.
My question is, if I put in for a variation (.22 FAC Air to .22RF) on a unfilled slot is this something that is likely to be dealt with as a 1-for-1 by the Firearms Licensing Manager or will the FEO visit me as if I am adding an additional slot and put me through the mangle again?
I probably won’t bother if it’s the later, although I could argue that as I have shot deer and fox on my own in the interim I can justify that I can now exercise safe judgement...
(BTW Thames Valley Police is my licensing authority).
What do you think?