Inherently accurate calubres?

Calubres? 😂, spent a happy hour on farm this am with my flat pack shooti’n bench, four rounds to sort the .25-06 wearing the PARD 007, A good bullet on bullet @ the requisite 220 feet. 😎.
 
I’ve had a veritable pile of 243’s and just about all of them shot great with handloads and a few were sub 1/4 MOA . Most all of the 260’s I’ve owned have been sub 1/2 MOA again with handloads . I’ve NEVER had a Triple Deuce that shot worse than excellent . Both the 6 PPC’s I’ve owned were sub 1/4 MOA . The pair of 204 Rugers I had were close to 1/4 MOA guns . Both of the 6.5-06 I had and have are sub 1/2 MOA . And while not Exactly the same of the 375 H&H Mags I’ve messed with they were all sub 3/4 MOA if I was holding the gun correctly . Almost forgot the 6.5 Grendel has weaseled its way into what I would call inherently accurate , my CZ 527 HB and Alexander Arms AR-15 are both tack drivers . The AR hovers at or a skoosh less than 1/2 MOA while the CZ has already shot sub 1/10 MOA groups . I do have a Howa Grendel that to dates only done about 5/8 MOA but for a $400 rifle I think that’s pretty darn good .
 
Last edited:
Some years ago i read in the Benchrest Shooting book that a custom built BR rifle, chambered in 30-30 with quality cut rifled barrel in side by side tests with a 6mmPPC BR rifle shot equally as well
 
Some years ago i read in the Benchrest Shooting book that a custom built BR rifle, chambered in 30-30 with quality cut rifled barrel in side by side tests with a 6mmPPC BR rifle shot equally as well
And sir you proved a point with this post. Accuracy is holding tolerances, Square mating surfaces, great ammunition ,great scope, great trigger and a talented shooter.
 
My experience of different calibres is somewhat limited, but of the few I've fired the 22-250 impressed me most for accuracy. I'm a pretty poor shot myself, so when I placed 3 shots through one ragged hole at 100m in a howling gale and pouring rain using a rifle I'd never handled before I was astounded!
 
My experience of different calibres is somewhat limited, but of the few I've fired the 22-250 impressed me most for accuracy. I'm a pretty poor shot myself, so when I placed 3 shots through one ragged hole at 100m in a howling gale and pouring rain using a rifle I'd never handled before I was astounded!
But if the variable wind hadn't blown 'em all thru the same hole, it would've been a 4" group :D
 
But if the variable wind hadn't blown 'em all thru the same hole, it would've been a 4" group :D
Well that thought did occur to me, I must admit! To be honest, I was struggling to see the target because of the rain. But nevertheless, 3 shots through the same hole left me mightily impressed with the accuracy of the 22-250.
 
What's a Calubre ?
I think I know what calibre means, and I think I know what Americans mean when they miss-spell it as caliber but I haven't come across calubre before. :evil::stir:
 
The old Lyman manual used to say 222, 308, 375 from recall. While all calibre's can be accurate, some do seem to be less fussy with regards to a specific load.

When I changed to Vhit in 308, I loaded 8 rounds each with 0.5 more powder to look for signs of pressure, the 0.75" group was unexpected.
 
No particular calibre (i.e. bore size) can possibly magically possess more potential accuracy than another.

I think we are confusing terminology here. A particular cartridge (not the actual calibre) when loaded with correctly designed and manufactured projectiles fired from a good firearm using suitable loads may have attained a reputation for easily achieved good accuracy. But to claim that any particular calibres are more accurate than other calibres cannot be correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 75
Back
Top