liongeorge
Well-Known Member
The received wisdom is to leave a skull uncut for highest points but how does this effect the volume measurement? (which is not a true measurement of volume but a calculation of weight difference when the antlers are submerged).
I had a gold medal measured full skull and cut it after and lo and behold the bit I cut off weighed exactly 90g so the deduction was spot on.
What i can't get my head around is the advantage/disadvantage it may give to the volume score which is a more important part than weight.
Any thoughts?
I had a gold medal measured full skull and cut it after and lo and behold the bit I cut off weighed exactly 90g so the deduction was spot on.
What i can't get my head around is the advantage/disadvantage it may give to the volume score which is a more important part than weight.
Any thoughts?