Which calibre to change too?

I occasionally like to stretch the legs on my rifles and take them out to distance, with something shaped like that it ain't gonna happen as easily 😂

I unfortunately shoot across a valley and 9/10 the winds are extremely strong. It has a massive bearing to hold off with something actually shaped like a bullet, not a brick. It's always bloody windy here so that is a factor I look for.

I'm out now as it happens, just no deer 🤦

All this BC bollocks, just shoot, the bloody things!

Once again, the bullet/ammunition argument continues, too much, bloody thinking and not enough doing!
 
They look like they have the BC of a brick
I'm also curious to the velocity you're getting out of them if you know it?
The factory load is doing just under 3,000 fps. BC will be around .25 or so. Or in other words about the same as a typical light for calibre bullet. Think 50gn in 243, 110 in 308.

They will shoot flat enough that with usual 1” and a bit high at 100 yds or 4cm high at 100m you will be within the boiler room with a centre of chest hold out to 200.

And they hit hard.

If you want to shoot bigger deer at longer ranges, you need a different cartridge - its not the job for the 243.

There are plenty of red and sika hinds being shot at the moment with these bullets.
 
The factory load is doing just under 3,000 fps. BC will be around .25 or so. Or in other words about the same as a typical light for calibre bullet. Think 50gn in 243, 110 in 308.

They will shoot flat enough that with usual 1” and a bit high at 100 yds or 4cm high at 100m you will be within the boiler room with a centre of chest hold out to 200.

And they hit hard.

If you want to shoot bigger deer at longer ranges, you need a different cartridge - its not the job for the 243.

There are plenty of red and sika hinds being shot at the moment with these bullets.
Where are you finding 50 gr in .243, 58 maybe but - the difference is the velocity for 55/58 gr in .243 (3600+3900 fps) and 110 gr in .308 (3350-3450) makes up for the poor BC, BC is also determined by speed so a lower velocity means a lower BC - waht velocity is the brick's BC measured at?

a 58gr from a .243 dropsaround 4.2" at 300 yards with your 1" high zero, the Brick 10.8" - you are not comparing apples for apples.....

I'm sorry but there are better copper bullets out there that perform ballistically and on game, there's simply no need to be shooting bricks at anything!

Rebarrel to a creedmoor ( you can even use your .243 brass) or .308 and shoot bullets that work well for drop and wind.......
 
Where are you finding 50 gr in .243, 58 maybe but - the difference is the velocity for 55/58 gr in .243 (3600+3900 fps) and 110 gr in .308 (3350-3450) makes up for the poor BC, BC is also determined by speed so a lower velocity means a lower BC - waht velocity is the brick's BC measured at?

a 58gr from a .243 dropsaround 4.2" at 300 yards with your 1" high zero, the Brick 10.8" - you are not comparing apples for apples.....

I'm sorry but there are better copper bullets out there that perform ballistically and on game, there's simply no need to be shooting bricks at anything!

Rebarrel to a creedmoor ( you can even use your .243 brass) or .308 and shoot bullets that work well for drop and wind.......
I am not at all suggesting shooting at 300m. I am talking about 200. And the velocity is 3,000 fps, so not exactly slow.

Even a 10” drop at 300 is workable if you know the range and drops of your load.

But 300 is pretty much irrelevant for the vast majority of deer. Most are shot well within 200.

And as for rebarreling - you looking at not a lot of change out £600, 700 or even more.

And agree there better ballistic bullets out there, but we have legislation that has a min of 100gn for all deer other than Roe.

If the OP is only occasionally coming northwards fir the odd stalking trip, there is no point spending the money on a rebarrel when there is a perfectly good solution already in place. But like everything in life it is a compromise
 
Last edited:
Where are you finding 50 gr in .243, 58 maybe but - the difference is the velocity for 55/58 gr in .243 (3600+3900 fps) and 110 gr in .308 (3350-3450) makes up for the poor BC, BC is also determined by speed so a lower velocity means a lower BC - waht velocity is the brick's BC measured at?

a 58gr from a .243 dropsaround 4.2" at 300 yards with your 1" high zero, the Brick 10.8" - you are not comparing apples for apples.....

I'm sorry but there are better copper bullets out there that perform ballistically and on game, there's simply no need to be shooting bricks at anything!

Rebarrel to a creedmoor ( you can even use your .243 brass) or .308 and shoot bullets that work well for drop and wind.......
And of course your suggestion of a 308 is good, but typically a 308 or any other deer legal stalking calibre will drop 7 to 10” at 300, depending of course on your bullet, cartridge, initial velocity and actual zero.
 
Why have you got .243 now? Did you get it because it was the smallest that would do the job, or are you sensitive to recoil perhaps?

I would say that the closest thing to what you have now would be a Creedmoor. A small step up in calibre, but it will easily handle 120gr copper without knocking you around. There's plenty of ammunition available for it. I love the older and more traditional cartridges like the Swede but let's be honest here, if you don't home load the Creedmoor will offer a lot more choice of ammo and will be easier to find.
Possibly because this is what a lot of forces try push on new applicants. They certainly tried that in my area in fact I have friends in three adjoining forces areas that were steered towards 243 regardless of what they actually asked for.
If you reload or plan to in the future go for a 30-06 it will give you the opportunity to load for fox and Deer.

If you have no plans to reload ever, go for a 308 as it will over the broadest range of factory ammo.
You might be surprised by what different RFD's stock. I travelled a lot for work and whenever I could called into various gun shops. One had more 6.5 Creedmore than the rest put together, others varied between the common calibres.
 
That’s my point!

@TringSaint has stated the op should go for an ex military round due to the availability of fmj ammo for practice. Cheap PPU fmj for 6.5x55 has nothing to do with it being an ex military round and as you say we won’t be getting cheap milsurp any time soon….
You won’t get milsurp in anything other than 308.
But……. Any rifle chambered in a military calibre modern or old will have fmj readily available in order to cater for the service rifle and target shooters.
For this reason, if you fancy popping off some deer and in the nice weather chucking lead down a range then any military calibre rifle will give you both good hunting options and fmj target options, usually at a good price.

Didn’t realise I needed to spell that one out, but hey ho!
 
Thanks pal, my friend has a sako 85 in 6.5x55 which is a pleasure to shoot. So it’s definitely a contender
The only issue I gave with mine is that it came with a 22” barrel which is a pain as I like to carry muzzle down, but all good other than that, I can see the bullet strike whereas I couldn’t with .308, but that might be just me. I’m sure you will enjoy whatever you get, so have fun looking!
 
I’ve always been a 30-06 kinda chap, with the correct bullet choice you can shoot at anything. I recently bought a 243 and put the 30-06 into retirement but I wish I never had! 308 is also a great caliber to go for

5EFFA230-1360-4CB7-A6BA-739D639366B4.webp
 
You won’t get milsurp in anything other than 308.
But……. Any rifle chambered in a military calibre modern or old will have fmj readily available in order to cater for the service rifle and target shooters.
For this reason, if you fancy popping off some deer and in the nice weather chucking lead down a range then any military calibre rifle will give you both good hunting options and fmj target options, usually at a good price.

Didn’t realise I needed to spell that one out, but hey ho!
Well no, 7.62x54 is available as milsurp, 7.62x39, 7.5x55 GP11 and good old 5.56 x 45 to name a few.

The vast majority of calibres that are available as factory loads will have fmj or match target options.

So why recommend 6.5x55 on the basis that it’s an ex military round? When you can get fmj/target ammunition for most popular calibres?

Et voila






A few examples of non military, popular stalking rounds, with target options available for practice.

The point being that the fact the 6.5x55 is an ex military round gives it no advantage at all for practice ammunition. In fact fmj choices and supply are fairly limited compared to some other calibres!
 
Last edited:
And of course your suggestion of a 308 is good, but typically a 308 or any other deer legal stalking calibre will drop 7 to 10” at 300, depending of course on your bullet, cartridge, initial velocity and actual zero.
.308 with a spitzer, boat tail bullet of 150-175 gr at the speeds it is capable of is going to drop less and carry more energy than a .243 firing a 100 gr brick. Likewise a 126 grain yew tree at 3100 fps + is going to be better ballistically and terminally.
 
.308 with a spitzer, boat tail bullet of 150-175 gr at the speeds it is capable of is going to drop less and carry more energy than a .243 firing a 100 gr brick.
Yes it will carry more energy. But differences in drop will be minimal. Perhaps an inch or two.
 
Yes it will carry more energy. But differences in drop will be minimal. Perhaps an inch or two.
Yep - of the order of c.2,000 joules (wotever they are) against c.1,400 for the .243 at 300m according to Sako and about 2/3 cms drop in favour of the .243 at that distance.
🦊🦊
 
Oddly enough lead free could work well in 243 for reds.

Its much more likely to exit. bleed out quicker and you get a blood trail.

No personal experience though.
 
Back
Top