acorn house
Member
So I’m buying a Mauser m12 impact in 6.5x55 and need some advice on the best copper rounds for this caliber? Mostly shooting Roe & muntjac but some fallow as well.
Sounds like you are looking for factory ammo. Sako, gecco and RWS all worth trying. In my experience fox bullets are no good in the 6.5 on the quarry you are hunting.So I’m buying a Mauser m12 impact in 6.5x55 and need some advice on the best copper rounds for this caliber? Mostly shooting Roe & muntjac but some fallow as well.
Sounds like you are looking for factory ammo. Sako, gecco and RWS all worth trying. In my experience fox bullets are no good in the 6.5 on the quarry you are hunting.
Problem is Ed in my experience fox bullets in the 6.5 x55 on roe and muntjac pencil through and do not kill quickly and run leaving a poor blood trail. Even if pinned through shoulders.We have good stock of factory loads in 6.5x55 from Fox Classic Hunter
100gr and 123gr
challenge for any retailer at the moment is getting reliable supply of any of the manor US or EU brands
Hard to recommend something you cant get hold of
Agree to disagree on this, while not currently using them I did use 100 rounds of the fox 123grn on a mix of fox, roe and fallow in my swede and had no issues at all with expansion. I’ve also used some of the fox ammo in my .222 for deer and fox and again, found them very good.Problem is Ed in my experience fox bullets in the 6.5 x55 on roe and muntjac pencil through and do not kill quickly and run leaving a poor blood trail. Even if pinned through shoulders.
They are better on bigger species (although had a few disasters with reds) . He needs something more frangible to be sure of a quick kill.
Running the 100gr in a swede you should be getting 3000fpsProblem is Ed in my experience fox bullets in the 6.5 x55 on roe and muntjac pencil through and do not kill quickly and run leaving a poor blood trail. Even if pinned through shoulders.
They are better on bigger species (although had a few disasters with reds) . He needs something more frangible to be sure of a quick kill.
I know , I know you keep saying this BUT real life shooting with real quarry does not support this on small animals. There are better than fox in the market for these.Running the 100gr in a swede you should be getting 3000fps
That kind of terminal velocity will remove the petals of any monolithic and kill anything quickly if put in the right place
No need to have them grenade and splinter all through the animal
That defeats the point of non lead
Game dealers don’t want ANY metal in the carcase
Pinning shoulders properly drops animals from the CNS shock
No blood trail required
FEE using 130/150gr .308 from 20” tikka/sako on roe with predominantly excellent results with a bigger slower bullet
Strange that the 6.5 would give you the results you have experienced
Anomalies do happen though
It’s not expansion it’s the lack of blood trail and long runners which was the issue. They didn’t kill quickly and when stalking in woodland this is an issue. Horses for courses and just shows one hat does not fit all.Agree to disagree on this, while not currently using them I did use 100 rounds of the fox 123grn on a mix of fox, roe and fallow in my swede and had no issues at all with expansion. I’ve also used some of the fox ammo in my .222 for deer and fox and again, found them very good.
I say it not from my own comparatively limited personal experience but from the data obtained from 6m study involving several 400+ roe shot in the field from Apr to august 2016I know , I know you keep saying this BUT real life shooting with real quarry does not support this on small animals. There are better than fox in the market for these.
Was enough for me and others using fox in other calibres who experienced this phenomenon in roe, fallow and red to stop using them.I say it not from my own comparatively limited personal experience but from the data obtained from 6m study involving several 400+ roe shot in the field from Apr to august 2016
12 individual criteria for each deer shot were recorded.
These compared to similar tests done on lead and other non lead used by a national forest agency.
The lack of expansion and pencilling you have observed in a much smaller data set doesn’t match the results from a much larger data set.