That picture looks spookily familiar to the first photo in my post #224 - any int whether they are the same or there are multiple failures?
Clearly two different ones, displaying the exact same failure mode.
Wafer thin aluminium tube blown apart at where it surrounds the first blast baffle, where the pressure is highest and the gasses that impinge upon it are hottest, then unpeeled and torn off all the way forward, also releasing the end cap as it was ripped apart.
Nothing to do with cleanliness or spraying with oil, or erosion of the first blast part (the bit with the titanium insert) or a bullet strike IMO. Some sort of erosion/corrosion of the weakest part, maybe, but that should have been considered in the design. Besides, I see none of that in the photos.
Good luck to those with squeaky clean ones, who like to take them apart regularly and keep them super shiny, but IMO there may be a material strength and/or quality issue that just might catch you out one day. In an explosive manner. Maybe not initially, but after fatigue, and heat, has got to the oh so lightweight outer bits. I mean, if it takes a small insert of titanium to protect that first baffle from erosion, yet the gasses then impinge directly on the unprotected outer tube, only a few mm away, what might be the expected outcome, after some use ? Sometimes less is not more I think. Particularly for the not inconsiderable expense.
No personal knowledge of these curiosities, but a fairly extensive engineering background. If anyone with one would care to measure up the areas of interest (specifically the outer tube wall thickness, diameter and thread dimensions) then I would be prepared to venture an opinion as to what might have gone wrong. Though I suspect it is pretty obvious from a cursory look.
ISTR another photo of an exploded F&D where the inner tube enclosing the baffle tube let go first, then took out the outer tube, but I can't seem to find it again.
Fact is, anybody so minded can set up as a silencer/moderator manufacturer, the cost of entry is just about zero if you have access to an under-utilised CNC machine, anodising facility, and some bar stock from wherever. And turn (literally) a few £ of material into whatever your imagination suggests, and price point to which you aspire. Knowing a bit about the hard facts of engineering and safety margins, never mind thorough testing, is not a prerequisite it would seem, sometimes.
The photos of the split and exploded Atecs also sobering. Seemingly similar issues, just "created" slightly differently.
The F&D TBH seems to be a simple internal baffle design of relatively small volume, surrounded by an outer chamber to catch the high pressure gasses that escape the first baffle. More like a muzzle brake inside a tube. Obviously appears to work, according to the reputation, so maybe not a bad idea. But implementation is key to pulling this sort of thing off.
Have F&D effed up ? Opinions on the back of a postcard I suppose, unless you are someone injured by one of these and trying to get recompense. Where the first point of call I suppose would be with the UK importer and distributor, this being the usual way with legal liability in this territory.
Compare and contrast:
