Steel shot??

Hull recommendation is to match chamber length to cartridge length when using steel shot, to reduce the risk of damaging the forcing cone.

From above post I wonder how this will affect clay shooting as all clay steel loads that I’ve seen are in 2 3/4 cases and most modern clay guns are 3” chambered

A lot of what is said will be to cover the manufactures and proof house backside in the event of damage to a gun so the user cannot then claim from either. It is up to the user what they use and what risk however small or large they want to accept.
Virtually most of the past years of experience with steel shot has been with very tough single use plastic wads, relatively little experience of the new generation of biodegradable wads, time will tell how well they stand up to steel shot especially HP cartridges.
 
Well guys I'm sorry but it's a big fat no from me.
First off, I've shot over 12 count steel cartridges at pheasants today for one bird and two lost birds!
That is unacceptable!
Below is a photo of three birds.
The one on the right took two steel cartridges at close range!
The birds on the left were lead shot at good ranges, similar birds to the two lost to steel but I've only fired four count cartridges for them two. Normal!
IMG_20250104_112617.webp

I also don't like this left lying around and some pellets stuck in the wad.
IMG_20250104_094905.webp

Re pressure, I've shot nothing today I would of put through my 3" AYA! Non of them felt aggressive and the grey things felt like a 410!

I'm sorry chaps but either you are shooting god's or just plain lucky or not telling the truth but they are absolutely shite as far as I'm concerned. If that's the future forget it!!
 
Well guys I'm sorry but it's a big fat no from me.
First off, I've shot over 12 count steel cartridges at pheasants today for one bird and two lost birds!
That is unacceptable!
Below is a photo of three birds.
The one on the right took two steel cartridges at close range!
The birds on the left were lead shot at good ranges, similar birds to the two lost to steel but I've only fired four count cartridges for them two. Normal!
View attachment 399916

I also don't like this left lying around and some pellets stuck in the wad.
View attachment 399917

Re pressure, I've shot nothing today I would of put through my 3" AYA! Non of them felt aggressive and the grey things felt like a 410!

I'm sorry chaps but either you are shooting god's or just plain lucky or not telling the truth but they are absolutely shite as far as I'm concerned. If that's the future forget it!!
2a.webp
20221231_081858.webp
STA60327.webp
On line lessons via DM :rofl:
 
Well guys I'm sorry but it's a big fat no from me.
First off, I've shot over 12 count steel cartridges at pheasants today for one bird and two lost birds!
That is unacceptable!
Below is a photo of three birds.
The one on the right took two steel cartridges at close range!
The birds on the left were lead shot at good ranges, similar birds to the two lost to steel but I've only fired four count cartridges for them two. Normal!
View attachment 399916

I also don't like this left lying around and some pellets stuck in the wad.
View attachment 399917

Re pressure, I've shot nothing today I would of put through my 3" AYA! Non of them felt aggressive and the grey things felt like a 410!

I'm sorry chaps but either you are shooting god's or just plain lucky or not telling the truth but they are absolutely shite as far as I'm concerned. If that's the future forget it!!
I've never seen that before?
 
I tell you what guys, had I used a muzzleloader I'd of been home much sooner because the bag would of been to heavy!
 
I love you attitude to everything Timmy. Tell me, do measure you private parts every day?

A geese. Want more?View attachment 399959
View attachment 399968

Other. Want more?
View attachment 399970View attachment 399971
I have a fair understanding of steel shot which has taken time and practice however you dismissed it in a morning.
I am not a fan of steel but have to use it to shoot duck/geese, I have learnt to work with it over time and tested it on pigeons with good results. No good slinging personal insults just because you have dismissed the working's of some other material. :tiphat:
 
A couple of posts have stated that standard steel cartridges are different to shoot because they have a higher muzzle velocity than lead catridges. According to the manufacturers' data, this is not generslly true, and in the cases it is true the difference is insignificantly small - under 2% and more than compensated for by the inferior ballistics of steel.
SUch claims might be treated with due scepticism.
As steel take up more volume than lead you have a lighter load if you use the same shotsize. You can compensate for lower pellet weight by using a larger shot size or a higher velosity or both, paying with a higher pressure. If you use both the same load weight as lead and a bigger shotsize you cant use more powder within resonable pressure in a short cartridge.
 
DaveT, I think you are slightly wrong when you said "Hull steel are Fe4, I. E. not quite a true 4 ". The "Fe" is the chemical symbol for Iron, (Ferrous), and just shows that the cartridge contains "steel" shot.
 
DaveT, I think you are slightly wrong when you said "Hull steel are Fe4, I. E. not quite a true 4 ". The "Fe" is the chemical symbol for Iron, (Ferrous), and just shows that the cartridge contains "steel" shot.
Hull use Fe4 as a shot size (3.25mm dia), which is the CIP maximum shot size for a "standard" steel cartridge.
Number 4 shot would normally be 3.1mm diameter, and as such make a steel cartridge with it in HP, and only suitable for guns proofed for HP steel.
 
you cannot argue with the law of physics throw a ping pong ball and a golf ball which travels further? Would anybody play golf with a ping pong ball.

Then regardless of shot type the ballistic coefficient of a round sphere is poor so initial muzzle velocity is soon reduced.
 
Back
Top